Tuberculosis: Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Antitubercular Activity of an Actinomycin Produced by a New Species of Streptomyces

 

Ravi G Patel, Chirag K Patel, B Panigrahi and CN Patel

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shri Sarvajanik Pharmacy College, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Arvind Baug, Mehsana-384001, Gujarat, India, Phone: 02762-247711

 

 

ABSTRACT:

Tuberculosis is an infection caused by the rod-shaped, non–spore-forming, aerobic bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Mycobacteria typically measure 0.5 ěm by 3 ěm, are classified as acid-fast bacilli, and have a unique cell wall structure crucial to their survival. The well developed cell wall contains a considerable amount of a fatty acid, mycolic acid, covalently attached to the underlying peptidoglycan-bound polysaccharide arabino galactan, providing an extraordinary lipid barrier. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is spread by small airborne droplets, called droplet nuclei, generated by the coughing, sneezing, talking, or singing of a person with pulmonary or laryngeal tuberculosis. These minuscule droplets can remain airborne for minutes to hours after expectoration. During the course of a systematic search for new antibiotics, an actinomycin complex was isolated from Streptomyces regensis sp. This actinomycin complex differs from other actinomycins described in literature in its amino acid composition and is very highly active against Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The strains of Staph. aureus highly resistant to penicillin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, tetracyclin and erythromycin are equally susceptible to its action.

 

INTRODUCTION:

Tuberculosis has recently emerged as a major health concern. Each year, approximately 2 million persons worldwide die of tuberculosis and 9 million become infected.1 In the United States, approximately 14000 cases of tuberculosis were reported in 2006, a 3.2% decline from the previous year; however, 20 states and the District of Columbia had higher rates.2 The prevalence of tuberculosis is continuing to increase because of the increased number of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus, bacterial resistance to medications, increased international travel and immigration from countries with high prevalence, and the growing numbers of the homeless and drug abusers.3With 2 billion persons, a third of the world population, 1 estimated to be infected with mycobacteria, all nurses, regardless of area of care, need to understand the pathophysiology, clinical features, and procedures for diagnosis of tuberculosis. The vulnerability of hospitalized patients to tuberculosis is often under recognized because the infection is habitually considered a disease of the community.

 

Most hospitalized patients are in a suboptimal immune state, particularly in intensive care units, making exposure to tuberculosis even more serious than in the community. By understanding the causative organism, pathophysiology, transmission, and diagnostics of tuberculosis and the clinical manifestations in patients, critical care nurses will be better prepared to recognize infection, prevent transmission, and treat this increasingly common disease.

 

 


Causative Organism:

Tuberculosis is an infection caused by the rod-shaped, non–spore-forming, aerobic bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis.4Mycobacteria typically measure 0.5 ěm by 3 ěm, are classified as acid-fast bacilli, and have a unique cell wall structure crucial to their survival. The well developed cell wall contains a considerable amount of a fatty acid, mycolic acid, covalently attached to the underlying peptidoglycan-bound polysaccharide arabino galactan, providing an extraordinary lipid barrier. This barrier is responsible for many of the medically challenging physiological characteristics of tuberculosis, including resistance to antibiotics and host defense mechanisms.

 

The composition and quantity of the cell wall components affect the bacteria’s virulence and growth rate.5 The peptidoglycan polymer confers cell wall rigidity and is just external to the bacterial cell membrane, another contributor to the permeability barrier of mycobacteria. Another important component of the cell wall is lipoarabinomannan, a carbohydrate structural antigen on the outside of the organism that is immunogenic and facilitates the survival of mycobacteria within macro - phages.5,6 The cell wall is key to the survival of mycobacteria, and a more complete understanding of the biosynthetic pathways and gene functions and the development of antibiotics to prevent formation of the cell wall are areas of great interest.6

 

Transmission:

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is spread by small airborne droplets, called droplet nuclei, generated by the coughing, sneezing, talking, or singing of a person with pulmonary or laryngeal tuberculosis. These minuscule droplets can remain airborne for minutes to hours after expectoration.5 The number of bacilli in the droplets, the virulence of the bacilli, exposure of the bacilli to UV light, degree of ventilation, and occasions for aerosolization all influence transmission.7 Introduction of M. tuberculosis into the lungs leads to infection of the respiratory system; however, the organisms can spread to other organs, such as the lymphatics, pleura, bones/joints, or meninges, and cause extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

 

Pathophysiology:

Once inhaled, the infectious droplets settle throughout the airways. The majority of the bacilli are trapped in the upper parts of the airways where the mucus-secreting goblet cells exist. produced catches foreign substances, and the cilia on the surface of the cells constantly beat the mucus and its entrapped particles upward for removal.8 This system provides the  body with an initial physical defense that prevents infection in most persons

 

exposed to tuberculosis.9Bacteria in droplets that bypass the mucociliary system and reach the alveoli are quickly surrounded and engulfed by alveolar macrophages,7,8 the most abundant immune effecter cells present in alveolar spaces.10 These macrophages, the next line of  host defense, are part of the innate immune system and provide an opportunity for the body to destroy the invading mycobacteria and prevent infection.11 Macrophages are readily available phagocytic cells that combat many pathogens without requiring previous exposure to the pathogens. Several mechanisms and macrophage receptors are involved in uptake of the mycobacteria.11 The mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan is a key ligand for a macrophage receptor.12 The complement system also plays a role in the phagocytosis of the bacteria.13 The complement protein C3 binds to the cell wall and enhances recognition of the mycobacteria by macrophages. Opsonization by C3 is rapid, even in the air spaces of a host with no previous exposure to M tuberculosis.14 The subsequent phagocytosis by macrophages initiates a cascade of events that results in either successful control of the infection, followed by latent tuberculosis, or progression to active disease, called primary progressive tuberculosis.8 The outcome is essentially determined by the quality of the host defenses and the balance that occurs between host defenses and the invading mycobacteria.11,15 After being ingested by macrophages, the mycobacteria continue to multiply slowly,8 with bacterial cell division occurring every 25 to 32 hours.4,7 Regardless of whether the infection becomes controlled or progresses, initial development involves production of proteolytic enzymes and cytokines by macrophages in an attempt to degrade the bacteria.11,12 Released cytokines attract T lymphocytes to the site, the cells that constitute cell-mediated immunity. Macrophages then present myco - bacterial antigens on their surface to the T cells.11 This initial immune process continues for 2 to 12 weeks; the microorganisms continue to grow until they reach sufficient numbers to fully elicit the cell-mediated immune response, which can be detected by a skin test.4,8,11 For persons with intact cell mediated immunity, the next defensive step is formation of granulomas around the M tuberculosis organisms16 (Figure 1).

 

Clinical Manifestations:

As the cellular processes occur, tuberculosis may develop differently in each patient, according to the status of the patient’s immune system. Stages include latency, primary disease, primary progressive disease, and extrapulmonary disease. Each stage has different clinical manifestations (Table 1).

 

How does a doctor diagnose tuberculosis?

TB can be diagnosed in several different ways, including chest x-rays, analysis of sputum, and skin tests. Sometimes, the chest x-rays can reveal evidence of active tuberculosis pneumonia. Other times, the x-rays may show scarring (fibrosis) or hardening (calcification) in the lungs, suggesting that the TB is contained and inactive. Examination of the sputum on a slide (smear) under the microscope can show the presence of the tuberculosis-like bacteria. Bacteria of the mycobacterium family, including atypical mycobacteria, stain positive with special dyes and are referred to as acid-fast bacteria (AFB). A sample of the sputum also is usually taken and grown (cultured) in special incubators so that the tuberculosis bacteria can subsequently be identified as tuberculosis or atypical tuberculosis. Several types of skin tests are used to screen for TB infection.


 

Figure 1. Pathophysiology of tuberculosis: Inhalation of bacilli (A), Containment in a granuloma (B), and breakdown of the granuloma in less inmmunocompetent individuals (c).

Images courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


 

 


Table 1 Differences in the stages of tuberculosis

Early infection

Early primary progressive

(active)

Late Primary Progressive

(active)

Latent

Immune system fights infection

 

Immune system does not control initial infection

Cough becomes productive

Mycobacteria persist in the body

 

Infection generally proceeds without signs or symptoms

 

Inflammation of tissues ensures

 

More signs and symptoms as disease progresses

No signs or symptoms occur

 

 

Patients may have fever,

Paratracheal lymphadenopathy, or dyspnea

 

Patients often have nonspecific signs or symptoms (eg. Fatigue, weight loss, fever)

Patients experience progressive weight loss, rales, anemia

Patients do not feel sick

Patients are susceptible to reactivation of disease

Infection may be only subclinical and may not advance to active disease

Nonproductive cough develops

Findings on chest radiograph are normal

Granulomatous lesions calcify and become fibrotic become apparent on the chest radiographs

 

Diagnosis can be difficult : findings on chest radiographs may be normal and sputum smears may be negative for mycobacteria

Diagnosis is via cultures of sputum

Infection can reappear when immunosuppression occurs


 

TABLE 2: Antitubercular activity of an actinomycin complex

 

 


Culture

Drug

Minimum inhibitory concentration in µg/ml

Complete Inhibition

Partial inhibition

M. tuberculosis H3, RV

Actionomcin complex

1

0.25-0.5

M. tuberculosis Ravenel

1

0.25-0.5

M. tuberculosis ATCC 607

10

5

M. avium B 19.2

2

0.5 – 1

M. tuberculosis H37RV

Streptomycin

0.5

0.25

M. tuberculosis Ravenel

1

0.5

M. avium B 19.2

1


 

These so-called tuberculin skin tests include the Tine test and the Mantoux test, also known as the PPD (purified protein derivative) test. In each of these tests, a small amount of purified extract from dead tuberculosis bacteria is injected under the skin. If a person is not infected with TB, then no reaction will occur at the site of the injection (a negative skin test). If a person is infected with tuberculosis, however, a raised and reddened area will occur around the site of the test injection. This reaction, a positive skin test, occurs about 48 to 72 hours after the injection. If the infection with tuberculosis has occurred recently, however, the skin test can be falsely negative. The reason for a false negative test with a recent infection is that it usually takes two to 10 weeks after the time of infection with tuberculosis before the skin test becomes  positive. The skin test can also be falsely negative if a person's immune system is weakened or deficient due to another illness such as AIDS or cancer, or while taking medications that can suppress the immune response, such as cortisone or anticancer drugs. Remember, however, that the TB skin test cannot determine whether the disease is active or not. This determination requires the chest x-rays and/or sputum analysis (smear and culture) in the laboratory. The organism can take up to six weeks to grow in culture in the microbiology lab. A special test to diagnose TB called the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) detects the genetic material of the bacteria. This test is extremely sensitive (it detects minute amounts of the bacteria) and specific (it detects only the TB bacteria). One can usually get results from the PCR test within a few days.

 

ANTITUBERCULAR ACTIVITY OF AN ACTINOMYCIN PRODUCED BY A NEW SPECIES OF STREPTOMYCES:17

During the course of a systematic search for new antibiotics, an actinomycin complex was isolated from Streptomyces regensis sp. nov. (Gupta et al., 1963). This actinomycin complex differs from other actinomycins described in literature in its amino acid composition and is very highly active agairtst Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The strains of Staph. aureus highly resistant to penicillin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, tetracyclin and erythromycin are equally susceptible to its action. This report deals with the antitubercular activity of this actinomycin complex. Antitubercular activity was tested by serial dilution method in Youman’s medium containing Tween 80 and bovine albumin Fraction V. The tubes containing the desired concentration of the drug in the medium were inoculated with 0.03 ml. of 14 days old culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37 RV, M. tuberculosis Ravenel and M. avium B 19.2, The results were read after 14 days of incubation at 37°C. In the case of M. tuberculosis ATCC 607, the reading were taken after 48 hours. The results of antitubercular activity of the actinomycin complex are shown in Table 1. It is obvious from the perusal of the table that the actinomycin complex shows a very high antitubercular activity. The growth of M. tuberculosis H37RV and M. tuberculosis Ravenel is inhibited in a concentration of 1 /µg/ml. There is a partial inhibition of growth in a concentration of 0.25 to 0.5 /ug/ml. The growth of M. avium B 19.2 and M. tuberculosis 607 is inhibited in concentration of 2 and 10 /µg/ml. respectively.

 

SUMMARY:

The actinomycin complex isolated from S. regensis sp. nov. shows very high antitubercular  activity which is comparable to that of streptomycin (Table 2).

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. World TB day—March 24, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(11):245.

2.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in tuberculosis incidence,United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(11):245-250.

3.       Goldrick BA. Once dismissed, still rampant: tuberculosis, the second deadliest infectious disease worldwide. Am J Nurs. 2004; 104(9):68-70.

4.       Porth CM. Alterations in respiratory function: respiratory tract infections, neoplasms, and childhood disorders. In: Porth CM, Kunert MP. Pathophysiology: Concepts of Altered Health States. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:615-619.

5.       Lee RB, Li W, Chatterjee D, Lee RE. Rapid structural characterization of the arabinogalactan and lipoarabinomannan in live mycobacterial cells using 2D and 3D HR-MAS NMR: structural changes in the arabinan due to ethambutol treatment and gene mutation are observed. Glycobiology. 2005;15(2):139-151.

6.       Joe M, Bai Y, Nacario RC, Lowary TL. Synthesis of the docosanasaccharide arabinan domain of mycobacterial arabinogalactan and a proposed octadecasaccharide biosynthetic precursor. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129 (32):9885-9901.

7.       American Thoracic Society and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(4 pt 1):1376-1395.

8.       Frieden TR, Sterling TR, Munsiff SS, Watt CJ, Dye C. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2003;362: 887-899.

9.       Jensen PA, Lambert LA, Iademarco MF, Ridzon R; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care settings, 2005. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-17):1-141.

10.     Korf JE, Pynaert G, Tournoy K, et al.Macrophage reprogramming by mycolic acid promotes a tolerogenic response in experimental asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(2):152-160.

11.     van Crevel R, Ottenhoff THM, van der Meer JWM. Innate immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15: 294-309.

12.     Nicod LP. Immunology of tuberculosis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137(25-26):357-362.

13.     Li Y, Petrofsky M, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium tuberculosis uptake by recipient host macrophages is influenced by environmental conditions in the granuloma of the infectious individual and is associated with impaired production of interleukin-12 and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Infect Immun. 2002;70:6223-6230.

14.     Ferguson JS, Weis JJ, Martin JL, Schlesinger LS. Complement protein C3 binding to Mycobacterium tuberculosis is initiated by the classical pathway in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Infect Immun. 2004;72: 2564-2573.

15.     Goyot-Revol V, Innes JA, Hackforth S, Hinks T, Lalvani A. Regulatory T cells are expanded in blood and disease sites in patients with tuberculosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2006;173:803-810.

16.     Rosenkrands I, Slayden RA, Crawford J, et al. Hypoxic response of Mycobacteria tuberculosis studied by metabolic labeling and proteome analysis of cellular and extracellular proteins. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:3485-3491.

17.     Gupta, K. C., Sobti, R. R., and Chopra, I. C., Hindustan Antibiotics Bull., Vol. 6 (1), 12, 1963.

 

Received on 30.12.2009

Accepted on 10.02.2010     

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics 2(1): Jan. –Feb. 2010: 23-26