N.A.C.S. In Assessment of Neonatal Status Following Caesarian-Section Under Anaesthesia: Pipecuronium Bromide

 

Dhruv V.K.1, Sahu A.2, Bansal A.K.3, Shashi Kala Dhruv (Thakur) 4, Baghel B.2, Viswanadham K. K.2 and Bithika Nel Kumar5,

Dept. of Anaesthesia1, Paediatrics2, Community Medicine3, Pathology4 and Pharmacology5, Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (BASTAR) -494001 –INDIA.

ABSTRACT:

Background: For Caesrian section to provide optimal anaesthesia, causing less transpass in to the existing patho-physiology of the mother and child, needs the use of such technique and drugs which have minimal side effects. Research question: Use of Pipe curonium Bromide as an anaesthetic agent, has any bearing, on neonates using Neurological Adaptive Capacity Score. Material and Methods: New Bornes of 85 mothers who have under gone elective and emergency L.S.C.S. were included in the study. Observations: 85%of newborns had an average N.A.C.S. score of 35.37 at 15 minutes, 38.46 to 39.90 at 2 hours and 24 hours intervals, there by depiciting a vigorous neonate with no evidence of cardio respiratory depression or residual effects of neuromuscular blocks drugs. Conclusion: Pipecuronium Bromide is a good muscle relaxant as evaluated by N.A.C.S.  System.

 

KEYWORDS: Muscle Relaxant, New borne

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

Recently more sophisticated analytical techniques have been applied in attempts to define deviations from normally in the newborn. These have developed from early investigations concerned with neonatal neurological and behaviour patterns of the newborn infants. As Apgar   score fails to distinguish fine differences in response to drugs reaching the infant in relatively low concentration across placenta, a more critical yet easily accomplished test is required, Thus the assessment of new born by neurobehavioural function tests has been introduced to reveal the residual effects of anaesthetic drugs. A study by Hollmen A.I. et al (2) also recommended neurobehavioural assessment as a sensitive test of overall infant condition. These neurobehavioural assessment defect subtle neurobehavioural changes in the neonate. Indeed many babies with normal Apgar score have demonstrable neurobehavioural changes within the first few hrs. of life (Scalon,et al 1974).A variety of examinations Neurological and adaptive capacity score (N.A.C.S.) Amiel - Tison et al (3) are currently available for evaluating the neurobehaviour of the newborn. (NACS) is the most widely used test for evaluating effect or obstetric medication on the newborn.

 

As very few reports of clinical study of this drug is available and in 1957 a study group of World Health Organization has expressed the view that in order to get a comprehensive picture of disease (drug used) more and more studies have to be carried out, Garg Narendra K.(1). This prompted the authors to undertake this study to assess the effects of Pipecuronium in balanced anesthesia on neonatal outcome..


MATERIAL AND METHODS:

This study was undertaken in the Medical College Hospital, Rewa (M.P.) In the year 1994 -97 in the Dept. of Anaesthesiology. A total of eighty five mothers included in the study who have undergone elective and emergency L.S.C.S. Neonate outcome were assessed by the use of N. A.C.S. test. The NACS is based on 20 criteria, each of which is given a score of 0, 1, or 2. NACS at 15 minutes, 2 hours and 24 hours as item of primary reflex, general assessment, passive tone, active tone, adaptive capacity scoring were assessed. The observations were tabulated and analyzed.

 

These criteria assess five general areas:-

1.      Primary reflex.

2.      General assessment.

3.      Passive tone.

4.      Active tone.

5.      Adaptive capacity score.

 

Thus each criterion is given a score of 0, 1 or 2 based on whether the response to testing is absent or grossly abnormal – 0, slightly abnormal – 1, normal. Therefore the maximum possible score is 40.Although the 20 items in the NACS can be performed in any order .The examiner determines the neonate’s best performance; if the neonates score 1 or 0 an item should be retested later in the examination to confirm the low score.

1.      primary reflex :          

-      Moro Reflex

-      Sucking

-      Automatic waking.

2.      General Neurological assessment:          

-      Motor activity

-      Alertness

-      Crying.

3.      Passive tone :              

-      Scarf sign

-      Recoil of Elbow

-      Poplital angle.

-      Recoil of lower limbs

4.      Active tone:                

-      Active contraction of the neck flexors.

-      Active contraction of neck extensors

-      Palmer grasps.

-      Response to traction.

-      Supporting reaction.

5 Adaptive capacity Score:              

-      Response to sound.

-      Habituation to sound.

-      Response to light.

-      Habituation to light.

-      Consolability.

 

OBSERVATIONS:

(Table -1) reveal that 14.21 + 4.46 in study group was comparable with control group i.e. 14.21 +4.31 which was on statistical analysis found insignificant (P < 0.01). N.A.C.S. of 35 TO 40 was considered to be vigorous new borne. At 15 minutes interval N.A.C.S. was 82% in study group and 92% in control group. At 2 hour interval N.A.C.S. was 91.66%in study group and 100% in control group and at 24 hours 100%in both group.

 

Table –II Showed that on comparison the N.A.C.S. of infants of study group at 15 minutes, 2 and 24 hours of delivery found 1999, 2236 and 2231 respectively in comparison to their counter parts control group 25, 974 and 996 having P value of < 0.01 which is significant.

 

Table –III Revealed that N.A.C.S. indices at different time interval s of both groups, N.A.C.S component each having a score of marks against each primary reflex -6, General assessment -6, passive tone-8, Active tone-10 and adaptive capacity scoting -10. The sub components of primary reflex requires assessment of moro reflex  2 mark, sucking reflex 2 mark, Automatic walking -2 mark. General assessment total 6, 2 for motor activity, 2 for alertness and 2 for crying Passive tone has 4 point of evaluation each of 2 mark such as scarf sign, recoil of elbow, poplitial angle, recoil of lower limbs. Active tone is of 10 marks with 5 items is to be evaluated, each having 2 mark such as active contraction of the neck flexors, active contraction of the neck extensors, Palmar grasp, response to traction, supporting reaction, adaptive capacity score has total of 10 marks 2 each for response to sound habituation to sound and response to light habituation to light and consol-ability.

 

DISCUSSIONS:

No significant affect on neonatal outcome could be correlated. Thus the presentation of the foetus did not alter the neonatal out come in our study which is in accordance with the studies of Crewford et al (1982).

 

The following table reveals the percentage of NACS after caesarean-section using pancuronium, vecuronium, atracurium and present study drug pipecuronium.

 

S. N.

Authors

Year

Drug Studied

NACS (35-40)

at 15 min.

at 2 hrs.

at 24 hrs.

1.

Dailey et. al.

1984

Pancuronium

29%

57%

100%

2.

Dailey et. al.

1984

Vecuronium

73%

73%

100%

3.

Hwakins et. al.

1990

Vecuronium

---

50%

70%

4.

Perzeault et. al.

1991

Atracurium

55%

90%

100%

5.

Present study

1996

Pipecuronium

80%

91. 66%

100%

 

In conclusion pipecuronium bromide for caesarean section is a good muscle relaxant because of its longest duration of action, no histamine release, a good cardiovascular stability and better neonatal status as evaluated by the  NACS System.

 


Table No. – I: Mean birth weight, NACS at 15 minute, at 2 hours and 24 hours in both group.

S. No.

Data

Study Group

Control Group

1

Mean birth weight

2.83 ± .56

2.66 ± 2.31

2

Baby’s crying time (in sec. ± mean S.D.)

14.21 ± 4.46

14.12 ± 4.31

5

NACS (35-40)

 

 

 

at 15 min.

80%

92%

 

at  2 hours

91.66%

100%

 

at 24 hours

100%

100%

 

 

Table No. – II: Compares the NACS of infants into both group at 15 min, 2 hours & 24 hours after delivery

S. N.

Items

Study Group

Control Group

15 min.

2 hrs.

24hrs.

15 min.

2 hrs.

24hrs.

1

Primary reflex

360/299

330

352

150/131

144

149

2

General assessment

360/337

354

359

150/149

150

150

3

Passive tone

480/449

465

473

200/197

198

199

4

Active tone

600/441

527

576

250/211

235

248

5

Adaptive capacity score

600/482

570

591

250/237

249

250

 

Total

2400/1999

2236

2361

1000/925

974

996

 

 

Table No. –III: Compares the NACS indices at different time intervals of both study and control.

S. N.

Item

Criteria

Study group

Control Group

15min.

2 hrs.

24 hrs.

15 min.

2 hrs.

24 hrs.

1.

Primary reflex

1.M.R. 2.S.K. 3.A.W.

86% 90% 35%

95% 96% 63%

98% 98% 90%

100% 100% 32%

100% 100% 68%

100% 100% 100%

2.

General assessment

1.M.A. 2.A.L. 3.C.R.

90% 88% 93%

96% 98% 98%

96% 98% 98%

100% 96% 100%

100% 100% 100%

96% 100% 100%

3.

Passive tone

1. S.S. 2.R.E. 3.P.A. 4.R.L.

93% 93% 91% 88%

93% 98% 95% 95%

95% 100% 98% 100%

96% 96% 96% 100%

96% 100% 96% 100%

100% 100% 92% 100%

4.

Active tone

1. A.C.N.F. 2. A.C.N.E. 3.P.G. 4.R.T.

5.S. R.

65%

51%

43% 76%  46%

83%

68%

63% 91% 71%

95%

91%

90% 98% 96%

92%

84%

8% 92% 72%

96%

96%

92% 100% 88%

100%

100%

100% 100% 100%

5.

Adaptive capacity score

1. R.S. 2.S.H. 3.R.L. 4.H.L. 5.Conso.

86% 41% 76% 38% 88%

98% 81% 93% 80% 98%

100% 96% 98% 90% 100%

100% 88% 96% 6% 100%

100% 100% 100% 96% 100%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

 

 

 


REFERENCES:

1.       Garg Narendra K. Evaluation of the impact of emesis and emesis plus purgation therapy; Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics: 2 (2) March – April 2010; 201-202.

2.       Hollman A.I. et al Neurologic activity of infants following anaesthesia for Caesarean Section. Anaesesiology 1978: 48: 350.

3.       Amiel - Tison et al. The neonatal neurologic and adaptive capacity score. Anaesthesiology; 2: 56: 492.

4.       Booth P.N. Pancuronium and the Placental barrier. Anaesthesia 1977; 32: 320.

5.       Duval - destin M. The Placental Transfer of Pancuronium and its pharmacokinetics during Caesarian Section. Acta. Anaesthesiology Scand 1978; 22: 327.

6.       Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1993) knowledge, Belief and Practice: A study of Tribal mothers about feeding of infants; Tribal Health Bulletine (ICMR); Vol. – 2, No. – 3 & 4: 1-2.

7.       Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1993) effectiveness of ICDS in child care in Rural and Tribal areas of Chhattisgarh (M.P.) J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol. – 6, No.-B (Science) 61-65.

8.       Bansal A.K. and Saxena V.B.(2000) impact of I.C.D.S. on Pregnancy pattern of Tribal and Non Tribal women. J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol. – 13, No.-B (Science) 54-58.

9.       Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1993) utilization of Health Care delivery by Tribal and Non Tribal women of an ICDS block (1993) J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol.-6, No.-B (Science) 57-60.

10.     Bansal A.K., Agarwal Ashok K. and Govila A.K. (1998-99) Status of girl child amongst Tribal and Non Tribal in the unreached rural India; J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol. – 11-12, No.-B (Science) 31-36.

11.     Bansal A.K. and Agarwal A.K. (1994) impact of training the knowledge of Tribal and Non Tribal Anganwade workers; J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol. – 7, No.-B (Science) 51-54.

12.     Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1997) Immunization status of Tribal and Non Tribal Children of Raipur district, Madhya Pradesh; Tribal Health Bulletin (ICMR) Vol. – 3, No.-2; 12-14.

13.     Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. Impact of I.C.D.S. on morbidity due to Nutritional deficiency Diseases amongst Tribe and Non Tribe Children; Research J Science and Tech.; 2009: 1(2); 82-84.

14.     Dailey P.A. et. al.: Pharmacokinetics placental transfer and neonatal effects of vecuronium and pancuronium administered during caesarean-section Anesthesiology 1984; 60; 569.

15.     Hawkins J.L. et. al.: Vercuronium for rapid sequence intubation for caesarean-section, Anaesth.-Anlg; 1990; 71; 185.

16.     Prrzeault C. et. al.: Residual curarization in the neonate after caesarean-section. Can. J. Anaesth. 1991; 38;587.

 

 

Received on 20.04.2011

Accepted on 18.05.2011     

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 3(4): July –August, 2011, 207-209