Evaluation of anthelmintic activity of Eichhornia crassipes roots

 

B.V.V.S. Surya Kiran1*, Bishnupada Biswal2, G. Nagarjuna Reddy2,  L.K. Kanthal1, N. Sridhar3.

1.Koringa College of Pharmacy, Korangi-533 461, E.G. Dt., Andhra Pradesh, India.

2KLR Pharmacy College, Paloncha, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

3Pydah College of Pharmacy, Patavala, E.G.Dt., Andhra Pradesh, India.

.

 

ABSTRACT:

Herbal medicine is having very old history. Plants are the typical manufacturers of complex drug molecules, which serve as a prototype to develop more effective and less toxic medicines. Helminth infections are distressing huge population in the world. These infections are contributing to the disorders like pneumonia, anaemia, eosinophilia and under nourishment. Anthelmintics are the drugs which expels the parasitic worms from the gastrointestinal tract by either paralyzing or killing the worms. So, there is a need of investigation of new anthelmintic molecules. Eichhornia crassipes belongs to the family Pontederiaceae, commonly known as “Water hyacinth” is selected as test drug based on ethno-botanical survey conducted in East Godavari Dist., Andhra Pradesh. In present study evaluation of anthelmintic activity of root extracts was done by using adult Indian earth worm Pheritima posthuma. The above activity was carried out using the petroleum ether, ethanol extracts of different concentrations using piperazine citrate positive control and normal saline as negative control. Overall anthelmintic activity revealed that concentration dependent nature of extracts. The extract shows potent and significant anthelmintic activity as compared to the standards and it was investigated to be used as effective anthelmintic drug.

 

KEYWORDS: Helminth infections, Anthelmintics, Eichhornia crassipes, Pheritima posthuma, Petroleum ether & Ethanol extract.

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

A number of plants have been tested for their anthelmintic efficacy (Dhar et al. 1968, 1973; Dhawan et al.1980; Aswal et al. 1984; Bhakuni et al. 1988, 1990;Chhabra et al. 1990; Robinson et al. 1990; Akhtar and Riffat 1991; Akhtar and Ahmad 1992; Chatterjee et al. 1992; Than et al. 1993; Chakrborty et al. 1995). In Meghalaya (Northeast India), numerous indigenous plants are used by the natives, who believe them to be curative against worm infections (Rao 1981).

 

Anthelmintics are drugs that either kill or expel infesting helminthes. Helminthiasis is prevalent globally, but is more common in developing countries with poorer personal and environmental hygiene affecting a large proportion of the world’s population1, 2. It is a macroparasitic disease of humans and animals causing immunomodulatory effects on the host, with implications for any co infecting pathogens 3. In developing countries, they pose a large threat to public health and contribute to the prevalence of malnutrition, anemia, eosinophillia and pneumonia1. Albendazole is the first reported anthelmintic which promises to have useful activity against all the types of helminth parasites menacing the domestic animals 4. The main problem in treating helminthiasis is “resistance to currently available drugs”.

 


Treatment with an antihelminthic drug kills worms whose genotype renders them susceptible to the drug. Worms that are resistant survive and pass on their "resistance" genes. Resistant worms accumulate and finally treatment failure occurs 5. Also the high cost of drugs and requirement of improved management, shifting the focus of patient from chemical control to natural anthelmintics.

 

Eichhornia crassipes (Water hyacinth) is a free-floating perennial aquatic plant. With broad, thick, glossy, ovate leaves, water hyacinth may rise above the surface of the water as much as 1 meter in height6, 7. The leaves are 10–20 cm across, and float above the water surface. They have long, spongy and bulbous stalks. The feathery, freely hanging roots are purple-black. An erect stalk supports a single spike of 8-15 conspicuously attractive flowers, mostly lavender to pink in colour with six petals6, 7. In present study anthelmintic activity of roots was screened.

 

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS:

a)      Plant material: The roots of the plants are collected from the Korangi village and shade dried. The dried roots are made into pieces. The powder was stored in cellophane bags.

b)      Worm collection: Due to its anatomical and physiological resemblance with the intestinal roundworm parasites of human beings, Pheretima posthuma (Indian earthworm) was used for evaluating the anthelmintic activity8. They were collected from local place, washed and kept in tyrode solution.

c)      Extracts preparation: The powdered roots are extracted successively in soxhlet apparatus, using petroleum ether, ethanol respectively. The extracts were evaporated to dryness and stored at 4°C until used.

 

d)      In vitro anthelmintic activity:  Eighteen groups of approximately equal sized Indian earthworms consisting of six earthworms in each group were released into 50 ml of desired formulation. Three groups were prepared as control i.e. distilled water, reference i.e. piperazine citrate (10mg/ml) and third of extracts (25, 50,100 mg/ml).Observations were made for the time taken to paralyze or death of individual worms. Paralysis was said to occur when the worms do not receive any sense even in normal saline. Death was concluded when the worms lose their motility followed with fading away of their body color, when dipped in warm water (50 0C) 9, 10.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

From the results (table-1) it is observed that ethanolic extract shows more potent activity. The extracts are showing paralysis within 6-15 min while death is comparable with that of piperazine citrate as death of worms was observed at 64 min. Future scope involves need of isolation of phytoconstituents responsible for activity.

 

CONCLUSION:

From the above results, it is concluded that Eichhornia crassipes roots showed significant anthelmintic activity. The experimental evidence obtained in the laboratory model provides a rationale for the traditional use of this plant as anthelmintic. The plant may be further explored for its phytochemical profile to recognize the active constituent accountable for anthelmintic activity.

 

 

 


Table 1: anthelmintic activity of Eichhornia crassipes roots.

Name of the plant

Type of extract

Conc. (mg/ml)

Time taken for paralysis (P) and death (D) of worms in min ± SEM

(P)

(D)

Eichhornia crassipes 

Ethanolic

25

13.36 ± 1.6

62.41±10.6

50

7.22 ± 1.6

49.20±3.9

100

4.11 ± 1.8

40.64±10.

Petroleum ether

25

14.42 ± 2.6

63.98±12.1

50

7.36 ± 1.3

49.31±3.5

100

4.92 ± 1.2

41.85±11.6

Piperazine citrate

10

22.63 ± 1.9

61.01±6.6

Control

-----

-----

-----

Values are Mean ± SEM; n=6 worms in each group *p< 0.05 is considered as significant when compared with standard drug

 


REFERENCES:

1.       Bundy DA. Immunoepidemiology of intestinal helminthic infection: The global burden of intestinal nematode disease. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg 1994; 8: 259-61.

2.       k.d. tripathi; Essentials of medicinal pharmacology , 6th edition, 808.

3.       Van Riet et al. Chronic helminth infections induce immuno modulation: consequences and mechanisms Immunobiology, 2007, 212(6):475-9

4.       V. J. Theodorides et al., Anthelmintic Activity of Albendazole against Liver Flukes, Tapeworms, Lung and Gastrointestinal Roundworms.

5.       Kushwaha and Aind; Anthelmintic activity of polyherbal preparations, international journel of pharmacy and life sciences, May, 2010; 35-37

6.       Shanab SM, Shalaby EA, Lightfoot DA, El-Shemy HA. Allelopathic effects of water hyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes]. PLoS One 2010; 5:13200.

7.        El-Shemy HA, Aboul-Enein AM, Aboul-Enein KM, jita K. Willow leaves’ extracts contain anti-tumor agents effective against three cell types. PLoS One 2007; 2:178.

8.       Thorn G.M, Harrison‘s Principles of internal Medicine,             1977, Mc Grew Hill, New York.

9.       AA Kale et al; JP Salvekara. J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 2011,        3(2), 298-302.Y Shivhare et al J. Chem. Pharm. Res.,      2011, 3(1), 488-491.       

 

Received on 10.04.2013

Modified on 14.04.2013

Accepted on 07.05.2013

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 5(3): May–June 2013, 183-184