An Analytical Study of Socio Economic
Status of Teenage Mothers
Dr. Bhagwan Gamaji
Ambhore1* and Dr. Rathi H.B.2
1Assistant
Professor, Dept. of Community Medicine, Dr. Ulhas Patil Medical College, Jalgaon Khurd (M.S.)
2Associate
Professor, Dept. of Community Medicine, Dr. Ulhas Patil Medical College and Hospital, Jalgaon
Khurd (M.S.)
ABSTRACT:
Background: In any community,
teen age pregnancy is associated with culture of poverty and deprivation. Teen
age mother hood is a problem of all segments of society. Objective: To know the
association of socio economic status and teen age mothers if any. Material and
methods: Two hundred and nine teen age
women who delivered in a tertiary care hospital taken as sample. Socio economic
status decided by modified B.G. Prasad's classification. Findings: More than 90
% women belong to Lower middle and upper middle class. There was not a single
case from Upper class. Conclusion and recommendations: In the lower socio
economic group daughters are considered as transitory members of family and
financial burden on family, so they marry their daughters as early as possible
to get free from this burden. The phenomenon of early marriage is highly
related to schooling of girls hence authors suggest that irrespective of caste,
religion, socio economic status, each girl must be given fees free education to
the highest level including medical and technical etc.
KEYWORDS: Education, Socio economic status
INTRODUCTION:
In any community, teen-age
pregnancy is associated with culture, poverty and deprivation. Teen-age mother
hood is a problem of all segments of society. In the low socio-economic groups
and in rural areas of developing or under developed countries including India,
most of the teen age girls are illiterate which limits the power, she has in
the family. By keeping in mind the above facts and as per recommendations of
the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) study group in 1957, that in order to
get a comprehensive picture of a disease/health problem, more and more such
studies have to be carried out, Garg Narenra K.(2) and Garg Narenra K.and Sharma A.B.(3), the
authors have under taken this study with the objective to study of socio
economic status of teen age mothers
MATERIALS AND METHOD:
This study is retrospective in
nature carried out from 1st August 2001 to 31ST July
2002. Two hundred and nine teen-age mothers delivered in Shri
Chhatrapati Shivagi Maharaj General Hospital, Solapur
(M.S.) were taken as sample. All the sampled women were interviewed and the
information was collected in a predawn and pretested proforma.
The mothers were interviewed in Marathi and Hindi. There were some Kannada
speaking mothers for them, assistance of translator was taken. All possible efforts were made to achieve
validity, authenticity and completeness of the information.
Socio economic status was decided by
modified B.G. Prasad's classification.
B.G. Prasad's economic
classification was adopted and modified as per all India consumer price index (AICPI)
for the month of January, 2002. AICPI for the month of January was 467 (base
1982=100)
Steps in modification
Step- i
Formula for deriving
multiplication factor (M.F.)
Value of AICPI X 4.93
M.F.=
-------------------------------------
100
= 467
X 4.93
100
= 23.0231
Step-ii
Multiply original income limits
with multiplication factor and round the product to nearest five rupees.
TABLE-I
B.G. Prasad's economic classification
modified as per AICPI for the month of
January, 2002
|
Social class |
Per capita monthly income limits in Rs. |
|
|
|
Prasad's classification 1961 |
Modified for January, 2002 |
|
I upper |
100 and above |
2305 and above |
|
II upper middle |
50 – 99 |
1150 – 2304 |
|
III lower middle |
30 – 49 |
690 – 1149 |
|
IV upper lower |
15 – 29 |
345 – 689 |
|
V lower |
Below 15 |
Below 345 |
OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION:
On analysis of the collected
data it was found that there was not a single mother belongs to upper class (Table-II).
Table further reveals that 127 (60.76%) women belong to upper lower and 63
(30.14%) from lower middle class while only 12(05.74%) and 07 (03.36%) belong
to upper middle and lower socio economic status respectively.
Philips F.S. et al (3) reported
in their study that majority of adolescent pregnant mothers belonged to poor
socio economic group. Osbourne G.K. et al (4) found
in their study that 82% teen age mothers belong to social class iv and v and
very few from class I and II. Pal A. et al (5) observed that there were 12.5 %
teen age mothers each from class I and II, 27.5 % from class III, 21.2 %and 26
% were from class IV and V respectively.
TABLE-II
DISTRIBUTION OF TEEN AGE MOTHERS AS PER
THEIR SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS n=209
|
Socio economic status |
Number |
Percentage |
|
I Upper |
NIL |
00.00 |
|
II Upper middle |
12 |
05.74 |
|
III Lower middle |
63 |
30.14 |
|
IV Upper lower |
127 |
60.76 |
|
V Lower Lower |
07 |
03.36 |
|
Total |
209 |
100.00 |
Behra R.C. et al (6) in their
prospective 5 years study noted that 62.5% of adolescent pregnant women were
from lower socio economic and 31.25 % from middle. P. Reddi
Rani (7) found that 77 % teen age mothers were from
lower socio economic class. The findings of the present study and those of
others were found more or less comparable.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
In the lower socio economic
group daughters are considered as transitory members of family and financial
burden on family, daughters are not expected to support themselves or their
aged parents in later life and benefit that does arise from education will be
reaped by their marital households. So they marry their daughters as early as
possible to get free from this burden. The phenomenon of early marriage is
highly related to schooling of girls hence authors suggest that irrespective of
caste, religion, socio economic status, each girl must be given fees free
education to the highest level including medical and technical etc. Then only
teen age marriage will be prohibited.
REFERENCES:
1.
Garg Narendra K.: Evaluation of the impact of emesis and emesis
plus purgation Therapy; Research J Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics:2 (2)
March-April;2010:201-202.
2.
Garg Narendra K and Sharma A.B. : Epidemiological profile of
patients attending a tertiary care hospital,Muktsar,Punjab
(India); Research J Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics:3 (6)
November-December;2011:311-317
3.
Philips
F.S. and Shivkamsundari S., Teenage Pregnancy; J. Obst. Gynaec. Ind. 28
(4);578,1978
4.
Osbourne G.K., Howet R.C.L,
Jordan MM.,The Obstetric outcome of pregnancy; Brit.
J. Obst.Gynaec. , 88: 215, 1981
5.
Pal
A.,Gupta K. Randhwa I.,
Adolescent pregnancy : A high risk group; J.Ind. Med.
Asso., 95 (5):127,1997
6.
Behra R.C.and Padte
Kedar, Unmarried teen age pregnancy, multifocal and multidimensiol medico social, Problem: A prospective study
of 80 cases; J. Obst. Gynaec.
Ind. 39 :130: 1989
7.
P. Reddi Rani, Rani U., Raghwan S., Rajaram P. Adolescent
pregnancy; J. Obstet. Gynaec. Ind., 42 :764,1958
Received on 02.04.2013
Modified on 06.05.2013
Accepted on 12.05.2013
© A&V Publication all right
reserved
Research J. Pharmacology and
Pharmacodynamics. 5(3): May–June 2013, 186-186