Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of the phyto-constituents obtained from the stem bark and leaf extracts of Phyllanthus emblica L. against different strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhi.
Bengal School of Technology & Management, Sugandha, Delhi Road, Chinsurah, West Bengal 712102 and Indian Statistical Institute , Plot No. 203, Trunk Road, Bonhooghly Government Colony, Barrackpore, Kolkata, West Bengal 700108
*Corresponding Author E-mail: serene1993adak@gmail.com, hsmaji77@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Phyllanthus (family Phyllanthaceae) is highly important medicinal plant which has been used traditionally for varieties of medicinal purposes of both microbial and non-microbial ailments. An in-vitro investigation is undertaken against five different strains of gram positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative pathogen Salmonella typhi with the extracts from leaf and stem berk of Phyllanthus emblica L. Plant. Phytochemical extracts were prepared in ethanol by maceration method and screened by chemical reactions of standard procedures. The flavonoid contents were further screened by TLC method. Ethanol extract of leaf and bark were characterised by FTIR as a supportive determination for the constituent. The extracts were applied on five strains of S. aureus e-145, ML-366, ML-15, ML-276, ML-145 and S typhi .A-2467, e-3404, E-145, B-111 and NCTC-14 with different doses of leaf and berk extracts. The susceptibility testing and the Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination showed 250 mg/ml and 25 mg/ml of leaf and bark extract respectively are effective on most of the strains of S. aureus, on the other hand 100 mg/ml and 50 mg/ml of leaf and bark extract respectively were successful to inhibit growth of the strains of Gram negative S. typhi. Phytochemical derivation revealed presence of aglycones and steroid glycosides as major components, orthosiphonis folium and petasins folium. Our experiments focus the scientific parameter for the traditional therapeutic use of other parts e.g. leaf and bark rather than only fruit of Phyllanthus emblica L. and enlighten the exploration for the further pharmaceutical use.
KEYWORDS: Phyllanthusemblica, Flavonoids, Antimicrobial activity, S. typhi, S.aureus.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Clinical use of antibiotics and chemotherapeutics occasionally results human natural system hazards by inhibiting protein synthesis or by misbalancing of natural flora in associated with adverse effects like inflammation, immune-suppression, hypersensitivity, weakness, diarrhoea and many more (Ahmad et al.,1998). Therefore traditional folklore plant extracts have been a major concern for experimental development by the modern Bio-science and proposed from the ancient time to be used as antimicrobial therapeutics (Del Campo et al., 2000). Many defined or undefined human diseases has been proven to be cured by the active constituents of Medicinal plants (Stary and Hans, 1998). In search of the scientific basis of the uses of medicinal plants many researchers invested their interests. (Ghosh et al., 2007) studied the antimicrobial performance of a number of traditional medicinal plants viz. antiba Terminallia chebula, Terminallia bellerica,, Punica granatum, Lawsonia alba and Mikaniamicr anthacterial showed effect on Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris and Enterobacter aerogenes. Our experiments were carried out with one of these useful medicinal plant Phallyanthus emlica L. The medium-sized deciduous tree belongs to the plant family Phyllanthaceae. It is also named as Emblica officinalis, Aonla, Aola, Amalaki, Dhatry, Amla and Indian Gooseberry. The high nutrition value and enrichment with vitamin C, minerals (such as calcium, phosphorus, iron etc.), amino acids, carotene, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin, other flavonoids and fibre contain makes Amla attractive for scientific research (Srinivasan 1994, D.A Dhale 2012). Exhaustive survey reports proved that the plant is a standard remedy for different types of ailments like emetic and purgative (Lemmenset al.,1999).
Many varieties of the species, belonging to the genus Phyllanthus, have been investigated phytochemically and pharmaceutically and different molecules have been isolated and identified. Our study is based on a systematic screening of leaf and stem berk of Phallyanthus emlica L. and study effect on five different strains of each of gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (e-145, ML-366, ML-15, ML-276, ML-145) and gram negative bacteria Salmonella typhi (A-2467, e-3404, E-145, B-111, NCTC-14) by mean of MIC. Both of the bacteria show faster resisting evolution which is a great threat on medical science (Chin et al., 2002; Benoit et al., 2003; Abdullah et al., 2005and Chambers et al., 1997). Astonishingly, the bacteria showed strain to strain MIC level variation. The study also focuses on the potentiality of the phytochemical extracts of leaf and bark of Amla for futuretherapeutic use.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS:
2.1. Collection and identification of the plant material:
Phyllanthus emblica L. (synonym: Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) was collected from the permanent site of Indian Botanical Garden and certified by Central National Herbarium, office of the Scientist – ‘D’, Botanical Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Howrah. CNH/TECH.II/2014/85/185 is the reference number of the herbarium.In all experiments, fresh plant materials were started for processing within 1-2 hours of collection and the extractions were done by cold maceration technique for in this study.
2.2. Sample of plant material extraction
The protocol followed by Vogel et al., 988 was followed for the extraction preparation. Each of the plant materials was grinded and 10g of each was added to 100ml of distilled water and ethanol in order to obtain water or Ethanol extract (100mg/ml). This crude extraction was done at room temperature. After three days, mixture was filtered with 20 mesh cheese cloth and was then further purified by Millipore membrane filter of 0.45μm pore-size and filtrate was evaporated.The sterile extract obtained was stored in sterile capped bottles and refrigerated at 4şC until when required for use.
2.3. Phytochemical screening
Preliminary analysis of chemical composition of extracts was conducted following the standardized methods of Sofoworaet al.,1993, Brain and Turner et al.,1975, Ushie and Adamu et al.,2010 and Ushieet al.,2012, Trease and Evan et al.,1989 to identify the presence of Secondary Metabolites (Alkaloids, Anthraquinones, Flavonoids, Tannins, Saponins, Glycosides, Cardiac glycosides, Terpenes) and to detect the presence of acidic compound, amino acid, protein carbohydrate, alurone grains, cellulose, lignin; the experiments suggested in Pharmacognosy Paperback was followed.
2.3.1. Test for acidic compound
Sodium bicarbonate was added to the Alcoholic extracts of both of the extract in 1:1 ratio.
2.3.2. Test for alurone grain
To the sample few drops of alcoholic trinitrophenol was added.
2.3.3. Test for Alkaloids
0.5 g of the extract was mixed with 2 (M) aqueous hydrochloric acid (5.0 ml) with continuous stirring on a steam bath. In a separate experiment 1.0 ml of the filtrate were added with a few drops of Mayer’s reagent, Drangendoff’s reagent and Wagner s reagent. The resulting solution was observed for colour changes.
2.3.4. Test for amino acid
Amino acid identification was done by millon’s test.To the test solution about (2ml) of Millon’s reagent was added and observed for colour change.
2.3.5. Test for carbohydrate
To the test solution few drops alcoholic alpha naphthal was added, then few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid was added through sides of test tube and observed for colour change.
2.3.6. Test for cellulose
To the sample extract, 0.1 (M) iodine solution and sulphuric acid was added and observed for colour change.
2.3.7. Test for lignin
Saffranine solution was mixed to the extract and observed for colour change.
2.3.8. Test for Volatile oil
To 1ml of extract Sudan III solution was added and colour change was observed.
2.3.9. Test for Fixed oil
5 drops of sample with 1ml of 1% copper sulphate solution was given.Then 10 % sodium hydroxide solution was mixed and the colour change was noticed.
2.3.10. Test for Tannins
0.5 g of each of the plant extracts was treated with distilled water (100 ml) and boiled for 5 minutes then cooled and 2.0 ml of the solution (filtrate) was mixed with a few drops of ferric chloride was added. The colour change was to notice.
2.3.11. Test for Glycosides
A small part of each of the plant extracts was taken in two separate test tubes and 0.1 M H2SO4 was added to one and distilled water (5.0 ml) added to the other. Both of the test tubes were heated for 45 minutes in water bath. The solutions were cooled and alkalised with a solution of 2 (M)NaOH. Fehling solutions (5.0 ml) were added in ratio1:1 to the two test tubes and waited for 3 minutes. The changes in reaction were observed and recorded.
2.3.12. Test for Saponins (lipid test)
To determine the presence of saponins, the emulsion test was followed. A small portion of each of the plant extracts was added to distilled water (20 ml), boiled and filtered and the filtrate used for the test. Two drops of olive oil was added to the frothing solution and shaken vigorously. Any change in the result was observed.
2.3.13. Test for Anthraquinones
0.5 g of each of the plant extracts were mixed and shaken with benzene (2.0 ml), and then 10% ammonia solution (4.0 ml) was added. The consequent mixture was shaken and the reaction was observed.
2.3.14. Test for Flavonoids
Lead Acetate Test: 0.5g of each extract dissolved in 5 ml of distilled water and mixed with 10 % of lead acetate solution (1.0 ml). The colour formation was noted.
Iron (III) chloride. To a portion of 0.5 g of the extract in water, two drops of iron (III) chloride was added and noted for colour change.
2.3.15. Test for Terpenoids (Salkowski test)
A solution of each of the extract was taken in 0.5 g and dissolved in 2.0 ml of chloroform and concentrated H2SO4. The presence of terpenes in the sample was detected as the colour changes.
2.3.16. Test for Waxes
To the test solutions, alcoholic alkali solution was mixed with stirring and observed for any change.
2.3.17. Test for Starch
To a portion of the aqueous extract of both plant extracts, weak aqueous iodine solution was added drop wise and the change of the colouration was under observation.
2.3.18. Test for Protein
Small part of both of the extracts were heated in a boiling water bath (100 ̊ C) for 10 minutes and noticed for any coagulation.
2.4. Thin layer chromatography for identification of Flavonoids:
For checking impurities, separating and for identifying organic molecules by TLC (Fried and Sherma 1994) was done.
2.4.1. Preparation and activation of TLC Plates:
The slurry, which was a mixture of stationary phase and water, was prepared by using the ratio 1:2 and 1:5 as required given in the table below. After preparing the slurry, the TLC plates were prepared by using the spreading technique.
2.4.2. Spreading technique:
The glass rod was used. The glass plates were staked on the base plate. The slurry after preparation was poured over the plates and the glass rod was allowed to roll over it. The thickness of the adsorbent layer should be 0.25 – 2mm.After setting, the plates were activated by keeping it in the oven for 1hr at 100şC – 120şC.
2.4.3. Application of sample Developing TLC chamber:
2-5µl of 1% solution test sample was spotted by capillary tube on the plates. The spot was kept (2cm) above the base of the plate. Now the TLC chamber was followed to develop by letting the solvent run against the gravity for 30 minutes.
2.4.4. Detection:
Detection was under UV chamber at 254 nm.
2.4.5. Determination of Rf value:
The Rf value was calculated for identifying the spots in qualitative analysis.It is the ratio of distance travelled by the solute to distance travelled by the solvent front.
2.4.6. TLC experiments on different mobile phases for flavonoids:
Maintaining the stationary phase as Silica gel 60F254 with different mobile phases viz. given in the table:
Table 1: Diferent ratios of mobile phases
|
STATIONARY PHASE |
MOBILE PHASES |
|
Silicagel 60F254 |
Ethyl acetate : formic acid : glacial acetic acid : water(100:11:11:27) |
|
Chloroform : acetone : formic acid (75:16.5:8.5), |
|
|
Chloroform : ethyl acetate(60:40) |
|
|
Benzene : pyridine: formic acid (72:18:10), |
|
|
Toluene : ethyl formate : formic acid (50:40:10 |
|
|
n-Butanol:glacial acetic acid : water (40:10:50) |
2.5. Determination of total ash value and acid soluble ash value:
· Total ash value
A silica or platinum crucible was heated to red hot for 30 minutes, allowed to cool in a desiccator and weighed. Unless otherwise specified in the individual monograph, weigh accurately about 1gm of the substance being examined and evenly distributed it in the crucible. Drying it at 100̊C to 105̊C for 1hr and was ignited to constant weight in a muffle furnace at 600̊C. The crucible was cooled in a desiccator after each ignition. Now the percentage of ash was calculated with reference to the air dried substance.
· Acid insoluble ash value
The ash was boiled with 25 ml of 2(M)HCl acid for 5minutes and the insoluble matter was collected in a gooch crucible and washed with hot water, ignited, cooled in a desiccator and weighed.The percentage of acid insoluble ash was calculated.
2.6. Determination of extractive values:
· Water soluble extractive value
5gm of the air dried powdered leaf and stem bark macerated with 100ml of water closed flask for 24hrs, shaking was done frequently during the first 6 hrs and allowed to stand for 18hrs. 25ml of filtrate was evaporated to dry in a tared flat bottom shallow dish at 105̊C and weighed. The percentage of water soluble extractive value was calculated.
· Ethanol soluble extractive value
5gm of the air dried plant material, coarsely powdered have to be macerated with 100ml of ethanol of a specified strength in a closed flask for 24hrs, shaking frequently during the first 6 hrs and allowing to stand for 18hrs.Therefore filter rapidly taking precautions against loss of water, 25ml of filtrate was evaporated in a tared flat bottom shallow dish at 105̊C and weighed. The percentage of ethanol soluble extractive value was calculated.
2.7. FTIR analysis of the extracted sample
The Fourier Transport Infrared Spectroscopy was done for structural elucidation and identification of the functional group. The wave number and the relative strength were observed.The functional groups and their corresponding wavenumbers noted.
2.8. Microbial inhibitory potentiality test
2.8.1. Test Organisms
The pure clinical isolates of the five strains of Staphylococcus aureus, e-145, ML-366, ML-15, ML-276, ML-145 and another five strains of salmonella typhi, A-2467, e-3404, E-145, B-111, NCTC-14 were obtained from Bengal School of Technology (a college of Pharmacy), Sugandha, Delhi road, Hooghly under West Bengal University of Technology, Bidhannagar, india. All the isolates were checked for purity and cultured in nutrient broth(Hi-media, M002) at 37 ̊ C and then maintained on Nutrient agar slant at 40 ̊ C in the refrigerator until required for use.
2.8.2. Preparation of the Media
Two media, Nutrient agar (NA) and Nutrient broth (NB) both of Hi-media, M002 were prepared in order to evaluate the MIC and Bacterial inoculums preparation. The media was prepared by dissolving 28 g of NA in 1 L of distilled water on the other hand 50 g of Nutrient broth was dissolved in 1 L of distilled water .They were autoclaved at 121şC for 20 mins and subsequently allowed to cool to about 45şC (temperature at which the agars remains molten) and poured in plate (Petri dishes) allowed for gel or solidification and broth is used for inoculums preparation.
2.8.3. Standardization of Inoculums
10 test organisms were sub-cultured in nutrient broth using a wire loop (done aseptically) and incubated for 24 hr at 37şC in an incubator. The growth of the micro-organisms in the broth by the turbidity produced was adjusted to match 0.5 McFarland standards (108cfu/ml).
2.8.4. Inoculation of the Plates and Application of the Extracts
The nutrient agar plates were inoculated with small volume (0.05 ml to 0.10ml) of liquid sub-cultured nutrient broth inoculums with a “spreader” in such a way that the surface of the agar in the plates were covered with bacteria and thus total eleven plates were arranged for ten bacterial strains and one control. The plant extracts were diluted 103 fold using dilution method for 10mg, 25mg, 50mg, 100mg, 150mg, 250mg and 300mg doses with appropriate labels. In wells (hole) diluted plant extract was added. Ethanol was also added in a well as control. The inoculated plates were kept in the incubator at 37şC for about an hour to allow the extracts diffuse into the agar. The NA (nutrient agar) was again aerobically incubated at 37ş C for 23 hr. The growth was observed.
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
3.1. Phytochemical screening
Plant material screening was done by mean of sieving and separating the hard polymerised materials (like lignin, cellulose, etc.), thus mainly the ethanol dissolvable materials were screened as shown in Table 2. The both extracts responded about in similar way is all the experiments. The flavonoid content was further screened by TLC method. The phytochemical extract of ethno medical plant P. emblica was proved worthy onto the traditional uses for anti- inflammatory action (Summanen et al.,1999).
Table 2: Phytochemical Screening Result
|
PHYTOCHEMICALS : |
OBSERVATION |
LEAF |
BARK |
|
ACIDIC COMPOUNDS |
No effervescence produced. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
ALURONE GRAINS |
No yellow colouration appeared. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
ALKALOIDS |
No redish brown precipitate with Dragendroff’s reagent. No redish brown colour precipitate with Mayer reagent. |
-VE -VE |
-VE -VE |
|
AMINO ACID |
No white precipitate indicates presence of amino acid. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
CARBOHYDRATES |
No purple to violet colour ring appears at the junction. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
CELLULOSE |
No blue-violet colouration took place. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
LIGNIN |
No pink colour was observed. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
VOLATILE OIL |
No red colour obtained. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
FIXED OIL |
A clear blue solution was obtained which indicated glycerine was present in the sample. The cupric hydroxide formed in the reaction does not precipitate out as it is soluble glycerine. |
+VE |
+VE |
|
GLYCOSIDES |
No colouration was observed |
-VE |
-VE |
|
TANNINS |
Blue colour appeared which is hydrolysable. |
+VE |
+VE |
|
PROTEINS |
Heat test: No coagulation and precipitation was noticed. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
STARCH |
No change in colour. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
STEROID AND TRITERPENOIDS |
No deep Red colouration. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
WAXES |
No saponification or effervescence appeared. |
-VE |
-VE |
|
FLAVONOIDS |
Pink scarlet, crimson red or occasionally green to blue colour appeared for few minutes. |
+VE
|
+VE |
+VE = presence of the phytochemical, -VE = phytochemical absent.
Basic chemical reactions for identification of the presence of phytochemicals indicated mainly the presence of fixed oils, flavonoids and tannins for both of the plant extracts. No carbohydrate, protein or lipid molecules appeared to be present. The flavonoids were further evaluated by TLC and the primary chemical nature of these phytochemicals was justified by FTIR analysis.
3. 2. Thin layer chromatography for identification of Flavonoids:
TLC method was conducted by following the guidelines of Fried and Sherman (1994). The TLC plates were prepared manually and the chemical reactions were made with a careful manner. The test result was represented in Table 3.
Table 3: TLC of different mobile phases of flavonoids of both extracts ( Sangeeta Sankhalkar et al ., 2016) :
|
Mobile phase |
Statoinary phase |
Adsorbant water Ratio |
No. of components Leaf and Bark |
Rf Value in leaf |
Rf Value in Bark |
Type of flavonoids in leaf |
Type of flavonoids in Bark |
|
|
Ethylacetate:formic acid :glacial acetic acid: water (100:11:11:27) |
Silicagel 60F254 |
1:2 |
1 |
1 |
0.93 |
0.93
|
Biflavonyl. |
Biflavonyl. |
|
Chlororom : acetone : formic acid (75:16.5:8.5) |
Silicagel 60F254 |
1:2 |
1 |
1 |
0.36 |
1
|
Glycosyl flavones |
Biflavonyl. |
|
Chloroform : ethyl acetate (60:40) |
Silicagel 60F254 |
1:2 |
2 |
2 |
0.56 and 0.85 |
0.56 and 0.85 |
Flavonols (myrcetin) and kaempferol |
Flavonols (myrcetin) and kaempferol |
|
Benzene : pyridine: formic acid (72:18:10) |
Silicagel 60F254 |
1:2 |
1 |
1 |
0.94 |
0.89
|
Biflavonyl. |
kaempferol |
|
Toluene : ethyl formate : formic acid (50:40:10) |
Silicagel 60F254 |
1:2 |
3 |
3 |
0.14, 0.34 and 0.93 |
0.354, 0.66 and 0.93 |
Glycosylflavonesandbiflavonyl. |
Glycosylflavones, flavones andBiflavonyl. |
|
n-Butanol: glacial acetic acid : water (40:10:50) |
Cellulose |
1:5 |
1 |
1 |
0.91 |
0.94 |
Biflavonyl. |
Biflavonyl. |
|
Chloroform (with chamber saturation ) |
Silicagel 60F254 |
1:2 |
2 |
1 |
0.48 and 0.48 |
0.45
|
Flavonols (myrcetin) |
Flavonols (myrcetin) |
Rf = Retention factor
The TLC analysis showed the presence of Biflavonyl, kaempferol in major and Glycosyl flavones, Flavonols (myrcetin) as well, which are all different types of flavonoids.TheRf values were utilised to understand the purity and chemical constituent of the extracts.
3.3. Determinanation of ash values and extractive values value (Kamalesh Upreti et al., 2013):
3.3.1. Total ash value
Total ash value was calculated by simple percentage dependent method with following formula (Kamalesh Upreti et al.,2013 ):
× 100.
3.3.2. Acid insoluble ash value
The ash collected is further used for acid insoluble value by diluting in HCL. The value is calculated with following formula:
× 100.
3.3.3. Water soluble extractive value
The content of extractable matter was calculated in mg per gm of air dried material using the following formula:
× 100.
3.3.4. Ethanol soluble extractive value
The content of extractable matter was determined in mg per gm of air-dried material by using this formula:-
× 100.
All values are shown in table 4: In a comparative presentation.
Table 4:
|
Plant components |
Water soluble extractive value |
Ethanol soluble extractive value |
Total ash value |
Acid soluble ash value |
|
Leaf |
23 % |
48% |
6.41% |
2.765 % |
|
Stem bark |
26.4% |
48% |
7.37% |
2.538% |
The water soluble extractive value differs between leaf and bark whereas the value was more or less similar in case of Ethanol soluble extractive value. The ash value as well as carbon content was greater in case of stem bark, on the other hand, acid soluble ash value was more or less similar in both of the extracts.
3.4. FTIR analysis
Fourier transport infrared spectroscopy was based on absorption of infrared radiation, whose mode of action was by mean of vibration transitions. FTIR analysis was done (by Perkin Elmer FTIR Spectrum Two) for structural elucidation to determine the functional group and Natural Frequency of Vibration was analysed. The graphs are presented below :
Fig.1:FTIR graph of leaf extract
Fig. 2 : FTIR graph of bark extract
The presence of the functional group identified in both of the phytochemical extracts was listed in Table no. 5.
Table 5 :
|
BOND |
MODE |
RELATIVE STRENGTH |
WAVENUMBER (Cm-1) in case of leaf extract |
WAVENUMBER (Cm-1) in case of stem bark |
|
|
N-H |
Stretch |
M |
3681.71 |
3700.82 |
|
|
C=O |
Stretch(2v) |
M |
3504.53 |
3504.53 |
|
|
N-H |
Stretch |
M |
3515.97 |
3444.2 |
|
|
C-H |
stretch |
S |
2918.51 |
2921.81 |
|
|
C-H |
stretch |
S |
2852.23 |
2854.81 |
|
|
C-H |
stretch |
S |
2743.2 |
2743.2 |
|
|
C≡N |
stretch |
M |
2321.19 |
2321.19 |
|
|
N-H C=O |
bending |
m s |
1613.48 |
1604.81 |
|
|
O-H C-H |
bending bend |
m w m |
1435.55 |
1457.29 |
|
|
O-H C-H |
bending bend |
m w m |
1376.33 |
1376.33 |
|
|
N-H |
rocking |
S,m |
731.25 |
729.82 |
|
|
N-H |
rocking |
S,m |
697.47 |
701.77 |
|
|
C-Cl |
stretch |
S |
649.35 |
649.52 |
m = medium , S =small , w = weak,
The FTIR analysis indicated presence of N-H, C=O, N-H, C-H, C-H, C-H, C≡N, N-H, C=O, O-H, C-H, O-H, C-H, N-H, N-H and C-Cl bonds in case of both of the plant extracts. The FTIR value highlights the structural compositions identified from chemical tests and TLC method. Apart from the basic steroid structure of flavonoids, the method supports the information about the structural derivatives.
3.5. Microbial inhibitory potentiality test:
The NA plates were inoculated with small volume (0.05 ml to 0.10ml) of liquid sub-cultured nutrient broth inoculums. Eleven plates were arranged for ten bacterial strains and one control. Both of the plant extracts were diluted into ethanol using dilution method in 10µg, 25µg, 50µg, 100µg, 150µg, 250µg and 300µg with appropriate labelled. In wells (hole) diluted plant extract were introduced along with one well with ethanol as control. The inoculated plates were left for about an hour to allow the extracts diffuse into the agar. The NA (nutrient agar) was aerobically incubated at 37şC for 23 h. The growth was observed. Table (6) represents the all the concentration of the extracts applied to all strains of S .aureus and the comparativedoses-response of the phytochemicals.
Table 6:
|
Concentration of drug |
S .aureus C 145 |
S .aureusML 366 |
S .aureus ML 15 |
S .aureus ML 276 |
S .aureusML 145 |
|||||
|
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
|
|
Control |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
10 µg/ml |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
25 µg/ml |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|
50 µg/ml |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
|
100 µg/ml |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
|
250 µg/ml |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
300 µg/ml |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Phytochemical extract from bark was proven to be more worthy upon the inhibition of all the strains of Staphylococcus aureus under our experimental procedure. Growth of all the strains was inhibited by 25µg/ml, in case of bark extract were 100µg/ml to 50µg/ml was proven to be inhibitory for leaf extract. Antimicrobial compound actively diffuses from the well into the medium and the bacteria sensitive to the active antimicrobial agents are inhibited at a certain distance from the disc (Monicaet al., 1984). The dose sensitivity was far distinct in case for both of the phyto-extract.
Table 7 was furnished with the dose-response for the MIC test with both the phytochemical extracts applied on five strains of S.typhi .
Table 7:
|
Concentration of drug |
S.typhiA- 2467 |
S.typhiE- 3404 |
S .typhiE -145 |
S .typhiB -111 |
S.typhiNCTC-14 |
|||||
|
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
LEAF |
BARK |
|
|
control |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
10 µg/ml |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
25 µg/ml |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|
50 µg/ml |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|
100 µg/ml |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
250 µg/ml |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
300 µg/ml |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
The extract when applied on the S. typhi, the bark extract was seen to be more potent as antimicrobial compound as 25µg/ml concentration prevented growth in most of the cases and 50µg/ml concentration was effective in case of E- 3404 strain. The leaf extract effectively inhibited the growth in a concentration of 100µg/ml but 250µg/ml for the strain A- 2467. The antibiotics resistance to an antimicrobial agent was almost impossible when application is done in a repeated manner (Ekhaise and Okoruwa et al., 2001). Therefore, phytochemical extract of these types of folklore plants could be significant ethno botanically for the use of these antimicrobial purposes.
4. CONCLUSION:
The preliminary phytochemical studies revealed the presence of flavonoids, tannins and fixed oil in ethanolic extract of the leaves and bark obtained from Phyllanthus emblica. Bioactive component present therein was separated out in TLC plate. Where mostly we found different types of flavonoids. The study also showed antimicrobial activity of ethanolic plant extract of Phyllanthus emblica against many strains of both gram positive and gram negative bacteria and thus it makes this plant worthy to be used as antimicrobial drug undoubtedly . But for which specific component it is showing its antimicrobial effect is not revealed hence in future, science we could focus on this unknown component. The results also indicated that scientific studies carried out on medicinal plants having traditional claims of effectiveness might warrant fruitful results.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are grateful to the authorities of Bengal School of Technology, College of Pharmacy, Chinsurah, West Bengal and Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata.
6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
7. REFERENCE:
1. Del Campo J, Amiot MJ, Nguyen C. Antimicrobial effect of Rosemary extract. J. Food Protect. 2000; 63:pp-1359-1368.
2. Ahmad I, Mehmood Z, Mohammad F J. Screening of some Indian medicinal plants for their antimicrobial properties. Ethnopharmacol 1998; 62: pp-183–193.
3. Stary F, Hans S. The National guides to medical herbs and plants. Tiger Books. Int. Plc. 1998; UK.
4. Panda SK, Thatoi HN, Dutta SK. Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical screening of leaf and bark extracts of Vitexnegundo L. from similipal biosphere reserve. Orissa. J. Med. Plants. 2009; 3(4): pp- 294-300.
5. Ekwenye UN, Njoku NU. Antimicrobial effect of Phyllanthus niruri (ChancaPiedra) on three enteropathogens in man. Int. J. Mol. Med.Adv. Sci. 2006; 2(2): pp-184-189.
6. Ghosh A, Das BK, Roy A, Mandal B, Chandra G.Antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants extracts. Nat Med (Tokyo). 2007; 62(2): pp- 259-62.
7. Srinivasan. Vitamin C in plants: Indian gooseberry Phyllanthus emblica. Nature.1994; 153: pp- 684-684.
8. Dhale D.A. Pharmacognistic evaluation of Phyllanthus emblica linn (euphorbiaceae). International Journal of Pharma and Biosciences, July 3.2012 ;(3):pp- 210- 217.
9. Zhang YJ, Nagao T, Tanaka T, Yang CR, Okabe H, Kouno I .Antiproliferative Activity of the Main Constituents from Phyllanthusemblica. Pharm Bull .2004; 27: pp-251–255.
10. Lemmens, R.H., Bunyapraphatsara, M. and Padua De, L S. Plant Resources of South-East Asia No 12( I). Medicinal and Poisonous Plants I.Prosea Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia. (1999). pp.386-387.
11. Raghu H.S. and Ravindra P., Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical study of PhyllanthusEmblicalinn. Inter. J. Pharm.2010 Khopde S.M., Priyadarshini K.I., Guha S.N., Satav J.G., Venkatesan P. and Rao, MNA Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2000; 64:pp-503- 509.
12. Evans, W. C. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. W.B. Saunders Company Ltd., London.2002; 15 ed: pp-191-393.
13. Soforowa, A. Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa. Pitman Press Ltd.1982; part 11:pp128-146.
14. Trease, GE and Evans WC. Pharmacogenosy. Baihere Tindall. East Bournr.2000; 13ed: pp- 380-499, 500-517, 544-547.
15. Ushie OA, Adamu HM. Phytochemical Screening of Borreria verticillata Leaves. Journal of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Ecology.2010; 3(1): pp- 108-117.
16. Ushie OA, Adamu HM, Ntui NT .Antimicrobial Activity of Borreriav erticillata Leaf Extracts. International Journal of Chemical Sciences.2012; 5(2): pp-175-178.
17. Birgitta J, Yvonne A, Carl E .Effect of regulation and education and reptile associated salmonellosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005; 11: pp- 398-403.
18. Vogel AI, In: Elementary practical organic chemistry. Orient Longman Limited.1988; 2ed: pp- 45-168.
19. Chin NT, Perry CM, Ly NT, Ha HD, Thong M, Diep TS. Randomized controlled comparison of azithromycin and ofloxacin for treatment of multidrug resistant or nalidixic acid resistant enteric fever. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002; 44: 1855-1859
20. Summanen JO. A Chemical and Ethnopharmalogical Study on Phyllanthus emblica (Euphorbiaceae). Division of Pharmacognosy. Department of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Finland; 1999.
21. Chambers HF. Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococci: Molecular and Biochemical basis and Clinical implications. Clinical Microbiology Reviews .1997; 10(4): pp-781-791.
22. Fried and Sherma.Thin-layer chromatographic: Techniques and application. Revised and expanded chromatographic science Mariel Dekker Inc. New York, USA.1994; 3 ed (series 66): p451.
23. Harborne JB, Marby H, Marby TJ. The Flavonoids.1975.
24. Ekhaise FO, Okoruwa P. Antibacterial activity of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis) extract on Staphylococcus aureus. Tropical Journal of Environmental Science and Health. 2001; 4: pp-28-31.
25. Upreti K, Semwal1 A, Upadhyaya K, Masiwal, J .Pharmacognostical and Phytochemical Screening of Leaf Extract of Zanthoxylumarmatum. International Journal of Herbal Medicine .2013; Volume: 1, Issue: 1: pp-6-11.
26. Sankhalkar LS, Vernekar V. Quantitative and Qualitative analysis of Phenolic and Flavonoid content in Moringaoleifera Lam and Ocimumtenuiflorum .Pharmacognosy Res.2016 ;8(1):pp-16-21.
Received on 27.12.2017 Modified on 18.03.2018
Accepted on 21.04.2018 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics.2018; 10(2): 53-60.
DOI: 10.5958/2321-5836.2018.00009.5