Pandey P, Kar PK.
Email ID Not Available
Pandey P.1* and Kar P. K.2
1Assistant Professor, Surgery, Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (Bastar) India
2Professor and H.O.D., Dept. of Dermatology and S.T.D., Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (Bastar) India
Volume - 5,
Issue - 2,
Year - 2013
History: About a century back histology was the only means of microscopic diagnosis of malignancy, since than two methods, exfoliative and non-exfoliative which includes aspiration cytology and imprint cytodiagnosis have gradually evolved.
Objective: Assessment of suitability of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, Imprint Cytodiagnosis and Histology in diagnosis of carcinomas.
Variables: Imprint cyto diagnosis, Fine needle aspiration and histopathogenesis
Materials and method: Seventy-four patients of carcinomas diagnosed by histopathogenesis taken as sample. Out of these 74 and 73 cases were diagnosed by imprint cytodiagnosis and F.N.A.C. respectively..
Findings and discussion: On comparision of results of all 74 cases obtained by Imprint cytodiagnosis,72 (97.29 %) were correctly diagnosed and 02(2.70%) false negative while nil percentage of false positive while in 73 cases diagnosed by F.N.A.C. 66(90.41%), 06(08.21%) and 01(01.36%) were correctly diagnosed, false negative and false positive respectively. Conclusion: Imprint cytodiagnosis was found slightly better than Fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnostic accuracy.
Cite this article:
Pandey P , Kar PK.
Assessment of Suitability of Methods Used in the Diagnosis of Carcinomas.
Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 5(2): 2013; 98-100